 |
FAQs Q: What is an
Assistive
Technology Practitioner (ATP)?
A: A service provider who is involved in analysis of a consumer's
needs and training in the use of a particular device.
Q: What is an Assistive
Technology Supplier (ATS)?
A: A service provider who is involved with the sale and service
of rehab equipment, assistive technology and commercially available
products or devices.
Q: What is a Rehabilitation
Engineering Technologist (RET)?
A. A Rehabilitation Engineering Technologist (RET) is a person
who applies engineering principles to the design, modification,
customization and/or fabrication of assistive technology for persons
with disabilities. An assistive technology device is any item,
piece of equipment or product system, whether acquired commercially
off the shelf, modified or customized that is used to increase
or improve functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.
The areas of practice for the Rehabilitation Engineering Technology
examination typically encompasses job accommodations, computer
access, mass/ public transportation, vehicle modifications, architectural
modifications and home modifications, augmentative/ alternative
communications, environmental controls, positioning devices, seating
and mobility, sensory aids, and learning accommodations.
Q: Must an individual obtain the ATP
credential prior obtaining the RET credential?
A: YES. The ATP is a co-requirement for earning the RET credential.
Q: What is the purpose of RESNA's
credentialing program for the Rehabilitation Engineering Technologist
(RET)?
A: 1) To ensure consumer safeguards; and 2) To increase consumer
satisfaction .
Q: What is the aim of RESNA's
credentialing program for the Rehabilitation Engineering Technologist
(RET)?
A: To provide a method for consumers and third party payers
to identify those professionals who have demonstrated command
of the foundation practice-related knowledge of Rehabilitation
Engineering Technology.
Q: What is the RESNA
Code of Ethics?
A: RESNA is an interdisciplinary association for the advancement
of rehabilitation and assistive technology. It adheres to and
promotes the highest standards of ethical conduct. Its members:
i. Hold paramount the welfare of persons served professionally.
ii. Practice only in their area(s) of competence and maintain
high standards.
iii. Maintain the confidentiality of privileged information.
iv. Engage in no conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest
or that adversely reflects on the association and, more broadly,
on professional practice.
v. Seek deserved and reasonable remuneration for services.
vi. Inform and educate the public on rehabilitation/assistive
technology and its applications.
vii. Issue public statements in an objective and truthful manner.
viii. Comply with the laws and policies that guide professional
practice.
Q: What is the:RESNA
Standards of Practice for Assistive Technology Practitioners and
Providers?
A: These Standards of Practice set forth fundamental concepts
and rules considered essential to promote the highest ethical
standards among individuals who evaluate, assess the need for,
recommend, or provide assistive technology. In the discharge of
their professional obligations assistive technology practitioners
and suppliers shall observe the following principles and rules:
i. Individuals shall keep paramount the welfare of those served
professionally.
ii. Individuals shall engage in only those services that are within
the scope of their competence, considering the level of education,
experience and training, and shall recognize the limitations imposed
by the extent of their personal skills and knowledge in any professional
area.
iii. In making determinations as to what areas of practice are
within their competency, assistive technology practitioners and
suppliers shall observe all applicable licensure laws, consider
the qualifications for certification or other credentials offered
by recognized authorities in the primary professions which comprise
the field of assistive technology, and abide by all relevant standards
of practice and ethical principals, including RESNA's Code of
Ethics.
iv. Individuals shall truthfully, fully and accurately represent
their credentials, competency, education, training and experience
in both the field of assistive technology and the primary profession
in which they are members. To the extent practical, individuals
shall disclose their primary profession in all forms of communication,
including advertising, that refers to their credential in assistive
technology.
v. Individuals shall, at a minimum, inform consumers or their
advocates of any employment affiliations, financial or professional
interests that may be perceived to bias recommendations, and in
some cases, decline to provide services or supplies where the
conflict of interest is such that it may fairly be concluded that
such affiliation or interest is likely to impair professional
judgments.
vi. Individuals shall use every resource reasonably available
to ensure that the identified needs of consumers are met, including
referral to other practitioners or sources which may provide the
needed service or supply within the scope of their competence.
vii. Individuals shall cooperate with members of other professions,
where appropriate, in delivering services to consumers, and shall
actively participate in the team process when the consumer's needs
require such an approach.
viii. Individuals shall offer an appropriate range of assistive
technology services which include assessment, evaluation, recommendations,
training, adjustments at delivery, and follow-up and modifications
after delivery.
ix. Individuals shall verify consumer's needs by using direct
assessment or evaluation procedures with the consumer.
x. Individuals shall assure that the consumer fully participates,
and is fully informed about all reasonable options available,
regardless of finances, in the development of recommendations
for intervention strategies.
xi. Individuals shall consider future and emerging needs when
developing intervention strategies and fully inform the consumer
of those needs.
xii. Individuals shall avoid providing and implementing technology
which expose the consumer to unreasonable risk, and shall advise
the consumer as fully as possible of all known risks. Where adjustments,
instruction for use, or necessary modifications are likely to
be required to avoid or minimize such risks, individuals shall
make sure that such information or service is provided.
xiii. Individuals shall fully inform consumers or their advocates
about all relevant aspects, including the financial implications,
of all final recommendations for the provision of technology,
and shall not guarantee the results of any service or technology.
Individuals may, however, make reasonable statements about prognosis.
xiv. Individuals shall maintain adequate records of the technology
evaluation, assessment, recommendations, services, or products
provided and preserve confidentiality of those records, unless
required by law, or unless the protection of the welfare of the
person or the community requires otherwise.
xv. Individuals shall endeavor, through ongoing professional development,
including continuing education, to remain current on all aspects
of assistive technology relevant to their practice including accessibility,
funding, legal or public issues, recommended practices and emerging
technologies.
xvi. Individuals shall endeavor to institute procedures, on an
on-going basis, to evaluate, promote and enhance the quality of
service delivered to all consumers.
xvii. Individuals shall be truthful and accurate in all public
statements concerning assistive technology, assistive technology
practitioners and suppliers, services, and products dispensed.
xviii. Individuals shall not invidiously discriminate in the provision
of services or supplies on the basis of disability, race, national
origin, religion, creed, gender, age, or sexual orientation.
xix. Individuals shall not charge for services not rendered, nor
misrepresent in any fashion services delivered or products dispensed
for reimbursement or any other purpose.
xx. Individuals shall not engage in fraud, dishonesty or misrepresentation
of any kind, or any form of conduct that adversely reflects on
the field of assistive technology, or the individual's fitness
to serve consumers professionally.
xxi. Individuals whose professional services are adversely affected
by substance abuse or other health-related conditions shall seek
professional advice, and where appropriate, withdraw from the
affected area of practice.
Q: What is the impact of the Assistive Technology
Practitioner (ATP) and Assistive Technology Supplier (ATS) Credentials
on Assistive Technology?
A (Source: RESNA):
a. Many persons with disabilities must rely on the use of
technology to function in their daily lives. Such technology
can dramatically expand and facilitate independent living, employment,
recreation, education, and management of medical risks. For
these persons, gaining access to technology can be critical,
but acquiring it can be costly, time-consuming, and risky if
done without professional assistance. Providing inappropriate
technology and technology-related services not only results
in user dissatisfaction and risk, but leads to waste and abandonment
of the equipment. To ensure consumer safety, satisfaction, and
optimum function in their use of assistive technology and rehabilitation
services, it is important that consumers have a way of identifying
qualified people who: 1) specialize in the evaluation or supply
of assistive technology services and devices, and 2) can provide
the necessary training on their use.
b. As an interdisciplinary association of professionals, consumers
and public advocates, the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive
Technology Society of North America (RESNA) aims to advance
both consumers and the professionals who serve them. For you
and for the field, we strive to promote and advance a recognized
set of professional standards through which providers of rehabilitation
& assistive technology can validate and promote their knowledge,
experience, expertise, and professionalism.
c. RESNA has developed two credentials that recognize a demonstrated
level of professional competence in the service provision of
Assistive Technology:
i. ATP: for service providers primarily involved in evaluation
of a consumer's needs, fitting, and training in use of a particular
device.
ii. ATS: for service providers primarily involved in the sale
and ser ice of commercially available devices.
d. Knowing that assistive technology (AT) professionals can
hold an ATP or ATS credential empowers the consumer to be a
stronger self-advocate while empowering the provider to raise
the bar of professional standards and market their own professional
expertise as a qualified AT professional.
e. The customer, whether an end user, an insurance company,
or a government agency, can have confidence that an individual
who is certified through RESNA offers:
i. A level of education and professional experience required
to meet eligibility criteria
ii. Knowledge of assistive technology, as shown by passing a
credentialing exam
iii. Professionalism and ethical practice, as prescribe by RESNA's
Standards of Practice
iv. Professional oversight by the RESNA Professional Standards
Board
Q:. How has Rehabilitation Engineering been defined
over the course of its history?
A: See the following references.
a . A. M. Cook and S. M. Hussey, "Introduction and Overview,"
in Assistive Technologies: Principles and practice, 2nd ed.
St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 2002, pp. 3-33.
b . D. A. Hobson and E. Trefler, "Rehabilitation Engineering
Technologies: Principles of Application," in The Biomedical
Engineering Handbook, vol. 2, J. D. Brozino, Ed., Second ed.
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000, pp. 146-1 - 146-9.
c . A. Y. J. Szeto, "Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive
Technology," in Introduction to Biomedical Engineering,
J. D. Enderle, S. M. Blanchard, and J. D. Bronzino, Eds. New
York: Academic Press, 2001, pp. 905-941.
d . J. M. Winters, "Rehabilitation Engineering Training
for the Future: Influence of Trends in Academics, Technology,
and Health Reform," Assistive Technology, vol. 7, pp. 95-110,
1995.
e . J. B. Reswick, "How and When Did the Rehabilitation
Engineering Center Program Come into Being?," Journal of
Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 39, pp. 11-16,
2002.
f . A. R. Potvin, T. C. Mercandante, and A. M. Cook, "Skill
Requirements for the Rehabilitation Engineer: Results of a Survey,"
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 283-288,
1980.
g . D. A. Hobson, "Rehabilitation Engineering - A developing
Specialty," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol.
1, pp. 56-60, 1977.
|